>From jad@hopper.ACS.Virginia.EDU Wed Sep 22 16:41:01 EDT 1993 Article: 31645 of alt.conspiracy Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.conspiracy.jfk,alt.activism,alt.society.civil-liberty.alt.individualism,talk.politics.misc,misc.headlines,soc.culture.usa Path: murdoch!hopper!jad From: jad@hopper.ACS.Virginia.EDU (John DiNardo) Subject: Part 5, PACIFICA RADIO Investigates the Murder of President Kennedy Message-ID: Followup-To: alt.conspiracy Keywords: PACIFICA RADIO Investigates the Murder of President Kennedy Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: U.Va. Internet Public Access Project Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1993 16:51:33 GMT Lines: 164 ____ ____ ____ ____---- ----____ ____---- ----____ ____ ---- ---- ---- T H E P E O P L E'S S P E L L B R E A K E R ____ ____ ____ ---- ----____ ____---- ----____ ____---- ---- ---- ---- DATE OF PRINTING PRICE: __ CENTS THE NEWSPAPER FOR THE PEOPLE OF [your territory; example:] MASSACHUSETTS * * * * * MORNING EDITION * * * * * EDITOR: John DiNardo PUBLISHER: [your name (optional)] ________________________________________ From the free airwaves of The People's Pacifica Radio Network station: WBAI-FM (99.5) 505 Eighth Ave., 19th Fl. New York, NY 10018 (212) 279-0707 ________________________________________ Part 5, PACIFICA RADIO Investigates the Murder of President Kennedy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (continuation) GARY NULL: Alright, now there are two other very VERY important issues here. And they are that the photographs of John Kennedy's body, where he is on his face, lying on his stomach here, it shows .... HARRISON LIVINGSTONE: Lying on his back! There's no picture of him lying on his stomach. GARY NULL: Oh, okay. Yeah, it's been turned around there. I have a picture of his back, and the first bullet hole .... HARRISON LIVINGSTONE: He's lifted up from the table. Yes. GARY NULL: Okay. The first bullet hole is about four inches, it looks like, below the .... HARRISON LIVINGSTONE: Well the larger hole is not the hole. It's about two inches below that. You'll see a small red thing, closer to the roller, and that, the men all state, was a hole. And they also indicate that that deep depression down toward the bottom of the roller is a bullet hole. GARY NULL: Yeah, well there are two bullet holes in his back. How can a man have two bullet holes in his back, and then .... HARRISON LIVINGSTONE: I don't know what the answer is, but I do know that there were gunmen all around that car. Senator Dodd's report -- that was appended to the House Committee report when he was in the House of Representatives -- stated that there were at least three gunmen firing, and two of them had to have been from behind because of the closeness of the shots. There ARE six shots on that Dallas [motorcycle] police tape recording. GARY NULL: Yeah, but you see, the Warren Commission does not state that. HARRISON LIVINGSTONE: No! They say that three shots were fired and two struck the President. GARY NULL: Also, you have the entire back of the head shown very clearly, and you do not see the .... HARRISON LIVINGSTONE: No. Part of that is not clear at all. You see the area that's out of focus there. The background is in focus and the foreground -- where the cowlick [is] closest to the lens of the camera -- is in focus. But the area all along the hairline from behind the ear down to the center of the neck (in the hair) is out of focus. And that's where they smudged all that over when they made their composite photograph. GARY NULL: Alright, what I'd like to do is this. Let's just summarize here for a moment. What we have are some CLEARLY retouched photographs. We have more bullet holes in the President's body than the Warren Commission, or any of the so-called "official" investigations, have recognized. How in the world does a man end up with this many proveable bullet holes, and yet, still have one man doing all the shooting? Some of these bullet holes are clearly exit wounds. Some are entrance wounds. And yet, the Warren Commission has, for whatever reason, only presented that these were rear entrance wounds. The autopsy photographs HAVE been altered. The X-rays HAVE been altered. It is not possible to end up with an X-ray .... Let's say if you took a normal anterior /posterior skull X-ray, and then you took the Kennedy anterior/ posterior skull X-ray -- the Kennedy lateral skull X-ray -- there's an amount of facial bone that's missing. If this were presented in any regular forensic trial today, it would be LAUGHABLE. The evidence would be thrown out as inadmissible and faulty. We're going to take a brief break. I'd like both Jim Marrs [author of CROSSFIRE] and also, our guest on the phone right now -- who just returned from the press conference -- Harrison Edward Livingstone, who needless to say, was part of the reason that the AMA called this hasty press conference (and the press conference itself you'll hear a little later on. We tape recorded some of it) .... we're going to get to some information that I think the people in this audience have always wondered about. Are you aware that not ONCE were we ever given the real reason as to why the Watergate Break-In occurred? What was in the safe that they were looking for? Why did CIA people go into that safe? Why did Nixon authorize it? That brought down the whole Nixon Administration -- about sixty-seven of his top cronies. Why? We were never asked that! The media never probed it further than what was given to them. Well, you're going to hear something when we come back, about the link between Richard Nixon's men and John Kennedy's killers that ties the assassination directly to Watergate. (to be continued) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * There was an incident which remains vivid in my memory, and it has never been explored by anyone, though it might provide a fuller picture of the possible link between the Watergate Break-In and the assassination of President Kennedy. Those of you who are old enough will recall the numerous Presidential press conferences of Richard Nixon during which he was interrogatively flayed and driven to the brink of impeachment by a concerted onslaught from the press corps, members of which have since been alleged to be journalistic prostitutes for the CIA (e.g. Walter Cronkite and, I think, Dan Rather, notorious among many). In one of those press conferences (I think it may have been the "I'm not a crook!" press conference) a reporter asked Nixon [I'm paraphrasing]: You said something about the John Kennedy assassination ... And then, Nixon cut him off and exclaimed, with distress: "No, no, no! I didn't mean to imply that I know any more about that assassination than anyone else does." Nixon's tenseness at this moment was striking. Since then, I have wondered what knowledge Nixon might have regarding the assassination. What ought to be examined is a tape recording of that press conference so that perhaps a scientific voice analysis can be done to indicate, albeit not to prove, whether Nixon was lying about his lack of unreported knowledge of any evidence surrounding the assassination of John Kennedy.