(news)letter "Say the thing with which you labor." Thoreau from the porter micro.press Volume 1, Number 12 April 13, 1994 _________________________________________________________________ Please send suggestions and submissions. To get on the mailing list, send your name and address to: CTPorter 117-A S. Mendenhall St. Greensboro, NC 27403 or e-mail ctporter@mercury.interpath.net Your input is appreciated. Things need to lighten up around here! All kinds of events this week have had me walking around all in a meditative funk, worrying about things that were better left for the winter months. Spring is here strong, bloomings abound and the people should be happy! Here's an example of what's been going on in my head: I stopped in the Coffee Shop this morning to pick up a newspaper and bagel. All of the parking spaces right there in front were taken and I had to park, flashers on, in a spot that was clearly marked as off-limits: "NO PARKING, LOADING ZONE 6AM-6PM." The traffic cop had just passed by and I sat there, parked, wondering if I should leave the car. It became such a huge moral decision and I was very disappointed in myself even as I got out of the car and went into the store. While they heated the bagel Mike tried to make small talk while I wrestled with my conscience and kept peering out the window expecting to see a tow truck barrelling down the road to block me in and charge me thirty bucks just for the privilege of getting my car back. After I got the bagel and returned to the car, I realized just what a rat race I was making of this life lately. So maybe I morally erred but who's counting? Why not leave five minutes earlier and park in the empty parking lot across the way there? Why make this an ethical Rorschach Test? It was much too wonderful a day to be thinking along those lines. I wondered how I had gotten this way, how I had lost the smile from my face, and I figured that it probably had something to do with having to read Macbeth. I am leading a Shakespeare discussion group on the internet and so must compose some notes to provide a starting point. The responsibility has been on my mind for a couple of weeks. I always put things off, of course, but I had an actual reason to put off reading Macbeth: this play is so dark and it makes me worry about my fellow men. The actions of Macbeth make me contemplate the strength of my ethics, and his failure is all too real: if the devil knocked at my door one night to offer me all that I thought I would materially want, right then and there, for just knocking off a neighbor whose door was open, what would I do? For those of you unfamiliar with the plot, Macbeth is a Scots lord who encounters some witches, the weird sisters ("Double, double, toil and trouble; Fire burn and cauldron bubble"). They foretell that Macbeth will be king; coincidentally that very night the Scots king invites himself to Macbeth's castle. Macbeth kills the king and the witches' prophecy is fulfilled. As I say it's very grim and bloody, the atmosphere is a brooding one in Macbeth and things happen very quickly. Events are a whirlwind that sweeps Macbeth into a scenario he might never have sought out on his own. It becomes too easy to kill the king because there is no time to really reflect on what he does. It is afterwards that he has time, and given that time he becomes haunted. I began to wonder, pulling out of the illicit parking space, if it was true that, as I once read, "in the absence of a disinterested 'higher authority' any and all other 'rules' will be ignored in favor of gain for the rulebreaker." But I came to my senses and quit thinking about it. Maybe I should put the Portable Nietzsche that's on the bedside table back in the stacks and quit reading philosophy. Stick to novels and short stories and movies because otherwise I'm too dour. Frozen Frames This past week hasn't been a happy week in the world news. For me the week began ominously with a Newsweek picture that really bothered me. I thought about copying it here but I don't want to be mistaken for endorsing it in any way. But if you get Newsweek it's on page 37 of the April 11 issue: it shows an African National Congress supporter in Johannesburg with a big rock in his hand; a bloodied Zulu marcher is sprawled in front of us, back to the camera, an arm pathetically raised in an attempt to deflect the coming blow. If you've ever seen the Reginald Denny beating during the LA riots, you've seen this picture in motion. I really wonder about the photographer who could take such a picture. What happened next? Did the electric film winder go BKUG-ZZZZZZUT while the photographer wandered off in search of another shot? I remember seeing video of the stampede last fall at the University of Wisconsin at Madison and wondering about the photographer then, too. Fans stormed the field after a football game and several people died when they got caught between the surge of the fans behind them, and a barrier that wouldn't give in front of them. There, before my eyes, were people being crushed: one young lady in particular was hysterical, yelling and crying right into the camera; there were people all around, some jumping in to try and help, and still the film rolled. I couldn't believe that the photographer wouldn't do all he could to stop the horror that was going on: instead he zoomed in. Certainly shooting that video was no help to anybody. I'd like to believe that there were extenuating circumstances behind each of these cases. I hope that there was nothing that either photographer could do: they were too far away and caught the images on a screw-mounted telescopic 500mm mirror lens moon camera, or some such distance-shortening contraption. But given the human fascination with the gory -- how many times have you seen the Reginald Denny tape? -- it's a good bet that each photographer was paid handsomely for their film, and that whenever the images are shown, some of us will be captivated. And Blood Was Let Upon the Ground... Speaking of horrors, what about the eruption of violence in Rwanda? People are flocking out of this African country because of the civil war that has turned into anarchy. Streets are littered with bodies, ten thousand people are thought dead in the capital city of Kigali, and maybe another ten thousand are dead in the countryside. As savage as everything is, I find the sentiments of those who are leaving depressing: those we see interviewed worry so about the fate of their African friends left behind. There was an article in Wednesday's New York Times about the missionaries who are leaving: they came to the country to help the people and now when some folks really need help the missionaries are leaving. I don't blame them one bit for leaving -- their own consciences' rebuke them. One of the refugees was quoted as saying, "I think we have left a scar on our soul that will take a long time to heal." What a dilemma to be in, to have your faith tested like that, to judge your actions with a long history of martyrs ever in the back of your mind. "Pity Him, Leader of the Herd Again" The nation often wonders about President Clinton's leadership skills, when we're not being assaulted by Whitewater information, so it was with interest that I read Garry Wills' article in the current Atlantic Monthly, "What Makes a Good Leader?" (63-80). The type on the cover hooked me: "What is Political Leadership? Waffling? Acting? Following the Polls? Yes." These are political "skills" that I have grown very tired of, but the implication here was that all effective political leaders possess them and use them in order to get their way. Wills used as examples George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and most especially Franklin D. Roosevelt, and pointed out that they used political 'tricks' -- evasions, manipulations, prevarications -- to achieve their desired end. In pointing out an obvious fact, that a leader needs to have followers, Wills insists that the great leader must engage the followers upon whom he depends. "The leader is one who mobilizes others toward a goal shared by leader and followers." Wills contrasts the example of FDR with that of Adlai Stevenson. Before FDR was sworn in, the lame duck president Herbert Hoover wanted the president-elect's endorsement of some programs Hoover thought important to the country. FDR refused not because he didn't like the programs, in fact he would later introduce some of them himself; he refused, claims Wills, because he wanted to convince the people that only something drastic, only FDR's plan, could pull the country out of the hole, hence the New Deal. Stevenson, on the other hand, never lacked for supporters but they didn't do anything for him because he didn't fire them up. He waited for them to put him into office instead of convincing them why he needed to be the office-holder. Wills credited FDR's skills in leadership to his losing the use of his legs when stricken with polio: by having to appear strong all the time, even when he fell, FDR learned how to act. He had to become a master of control because he refused to admit to anyone else that he needed help, when it was so obvious that he couldn't do without that help. This article will make me re-evaluate my position on Clinton's leadership, and though there might be little change in that position, it might be fairer to the lessons of political reality. Bare My Foibles Will You? I'm very surprised that the movie Naked even came to Greensboro because the only mention I had seen of it was in the Village Voice, and the impression I got was that it was very seedy, lurid. This English movie deals with sex but I think the title refers to the personality of the protagonist, Johnny. He's like a bad dream, the guest who not only wouldn't leave but who berates his hosts for their bad taste. I think we all know a Johnny, someone who can tell us we wear no clothes, who exposes our pretensions, but who invariably grates on the nerves. There are a lot worse types of people out there than a man who mentally shakes up your life for a while. While this film is disturbing in parts, it's also hilarious and definitely worth a few bucks if only for the philosophizing that Johnny takes to the streets of London. His heated explication of some prophecies from the Book of Revelations is one example: he convincingly explains to the "insecurity guard" Brian the futility of living for the future since all signs point towards an Armageddon before the year 2000. Johnny espouses different theories depending on his audience, but they're always thought-provoking. Bonfire of the Banalities I always search out any Tom Wolfe that I haven't read, and I found an article in a book called Fifty Who Made the Difference. This book is a compilation of pieces commissioned by Esquire for their golden anniversary (in 1983). Fifty subjects were chosen, the most influential personalities of the last fifty years, and then fifty authors were recruited to write about one particular subject. There are some interesting pairings here: Ken Kesey writing of Jack Kerouac's import; Gore Vidal claiming Richard Nixon as his literary creation; Arthur Miller discussing McCarthy's hold on America in a piece on Edwin Murrow. Tom Wolfe's subject is Robert Noyce, the inventor of the microchip and subsequent founder and CEO of Intel. Wolfe credits Noyce with a huge influence in the mindset of Silicon Valley in the formative years when computer chips were making many a techno wizard filthy rich. In the Noyce's company there never were assigned parking spaces, there were no private offices, no rigid flowchart detailed a chain of command. Wolfe is never content just to describe and detail his subjects, he places them within an historical and sociological context. Noyce becomes the symbol of California and the New Economics against the staid, outdated business practices of the New York and Wall Street, where CEOs thrive on the exotic three-hour lunch at exclusive restaurants and chauffeurs at the beck and call. And Noyce is compared favorably to the founder of Grinnell, Iowa (his hometown), who fled the confining East and imposed his spiritual vision on his creation. Noyce did this as well, and his "town" was the center of the computer boom of the Seventies and Eighties. This piece takes its tone from the Midwest, as most of the major figures of Silicon Valley "had grown up and gone to college in small towns in the Middle West and the West" (298). For they were the people, despite what the Eastern Establishment would have the world believe, who were shaping the future at the time. This article is not Tom Wolfe at his most entertaining nor is Robert Noyce the most exciting subject Wolfe has treated. In fact, it's almost boring (heresy!). But I don't think I stretch the point that if it is blas‚, Wolfe meant it that way: the larger scheme dictated how he wrote. The Merry Pranksters would not be at home in Grinnell, Iowa. On the Net I've spent a lot of time on the internet this past week, and I can't really remember what I have been doing there. The internet sometimes strikes me as a complex information arcade game: sometimes the lights will flash and bells will ring and the player comes away with his cyber fix. Other times one plays, plays and plays some more, feed the quarters, and when you quit the game is over, the player hasn't won a thing. It's so often a chore just to find some interesting information. One source that always interests me, to which I periodically return is the Project Gutenberg. Here the user can find the electronic texts (etexts) of many books on file -- I read one and reported on it in the sixth issue, Bruce Sterling's The Hacker Crackdown. The purpose of Project Gutenberg is to get as much literature as possible out to the users and in fact their ambitious goal is to "Give Away One Trillion Etext Files by December 31, 2001." Here you might find the complete works of Shakespeare, Lewis Carroll's Alice books, the Fables of Aesop, the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the CIA World Factbook, Roget's Thesaurus, etc., etc., etc. Much of these texts are already in the public domain (i.e. they are old enough for the copyright not to be privately held), and it's rare to find a contemporary work on it such as Sterling's, but there are some interesting titles that one can find. And they want you to copy the files, just don't use them to make money for yourself. One problem is that these "books" are merely text files: if you don't want to read them on the computer you have to print them out. It might be cheaper to buy a used paperback instead of printing out the text file, but it sure is fun, the novelty of "finding" a book you can have for free. Quote of the Day I've been looking for a daily paper to subscribe to, and I believe I've finally found a suitable arrangement for The New York Times, so it will be appearing more in the (news)letter. I was told that the writing quality was superb, and in reading my "first" issue, Tuesday, April 12, I came across this lead paragraph in a story about the California bridge: Less than three months after an earthquake shut it down and more than two months ahead of schedule, the Santa Monica Freeway, aorta of this city's circulatory system, reopens on Tuesday. And if every public official claiming credit for the rapid repair stood on them at once, the two newly restored bridges over La Cienega Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue might just collapse again. A fellow named David Margolick wrote that and I think it's beautiful. The imagery of the freeway system as the literal heart of Los Angeles might not be original but I doubt it's been evoked quite as well. And the cynicism of the second paragraph! I think he won me to the Times. Merry Christmas, IRS. :(