IPNG Directorate Teleconference
                             May 9, 1994

	Reported by:  Steve Coya

This report contains IPNG Directorate meeting notes, positions and
action items.

These minutes were compiled by the IETF Secretariat which is supported
by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NCR 8820945.

ATTENDEES
---------

Scott Bradner / Harvard
Allison Mankin / NRL

J Allard / Microsoft
Steve Bellovin / AT&T
Jim Bound / DEC
Brian Carpenter / CERN	
Jon Crowcroft / UCL
John Curran / NEARnet
Steve Deering / Xerox PARC 
Dino Farinacci / Cisco
Eric Fleischman / Boeing
Paul Francis / NTT
Mark Knopper / Ameritech
Greg Minshall / Novell
Frank Kastenholz / FTP
Rob Ullmann / Lotus
Lixia Zhang / Xerox PARC

Regrets
-------
Ross Callon / Wellfleet
Dave Clark / MIT
Craig Partridge / BBN


1. The directorate approved the minutes of the teleconference held on
   April 25. Coya to place into IETF Shadow directories, and send
   copies of the minutes to the IAB and IESG.

2. A verbal roll call was taken to ascertain who would be at the
   retreat. Of those on the call, all were planning to attend except
   for Jon Crowcroft and Brian Carpenter (Brian will attend via
   phone).

   Coya to probe the three directorate members who did not participate
   in the call to see if they will be attending the retreat.

3. Allison announced that she and Scott had prepared an IPNG track for
   the Toronto IETF meeting.

4. Scott provided a brief summary of what occurred in the IPNG area
   during Interop in Vegas, and mentioned some upcoming meetings where
   there will be an IPNG panel. Allison summarized what would/could be
   happening at the INET meeting in Prague.

5. Allison outlined what is expected in the technical reviews being
   done by the directorate. Everyone was polled, and those who have not
   yet submitted their reviews stated they would have something soon,
   some by next week, all will be done prior to the retreat. 

6. Frank Kastenholz reviewed some of the comments/suggestions received
   about the requirements document. Following with tradition, each item
   was discussed in minute detail as/when mentioned :-)

7. The desire for a good revision of the requirements document, to be
   available as a reference point in time for the retreat, was
   reiterated. The document will be frozen and released in its final
   form just after the retreat.

8. The directorate stated that each candidate should bring a paper copy
   of their own document set.